Episode 28: Adversarial Agents from London
Published: Thursday, Apr 9, 2026 • Duration: 35 minutes • Season 1
Download MP3 | Watch on YouTube
from a London bus and Vincent in Vietnam!
Kai is attending https://www.ai.engineer/europe/schedule
summarize "https://youtu.be/Z6sGEwXMN0w" --timestamps --slides
Kai records this episode on his phone at a London bus stop while attending the AI Engineer Europe conference, catching up with his co-host remotely between sessions. The conversation covers Anthropic’s latest announcements, adversarial agent patterns, prompt optimization, and AI model capabilities, all against the backdrop of navigating central London on a double-decker bus.
London bus stop, AI Engineer Europe conference
Kai is attending a multi-day AI Engineer Europe event in London and calls in from a bus stop, phone in hand, to debrief on what he saw at an Anthropic workshop the previous day. The workshop walked through a blog post the two hosts had previously discussed, covering agent harnesses, evaluators, and adversarial agents. A term that kept surfacing was “rubric,” used by the Anthropic presenter to mean something close to a set of instructions or criteria, a word neither host had heard used in that context before. Kai says the session gave him a clear enough picture of the pattern that he feels ready to build his own harness, describing the goal as something that could spend around $100 and produce a usable artifact like a retro game tool.
Project GlassWing and the Mythos model
While Kai briefly drops off the call during his bus ride, his co-host introduces Project GlassWing, an Anthropic initiative tied to their upcoming Mythos model. GlassWing is described as identifying a large number of vulnerabilities, with the implication that the model can surface decade-old zero-days inside foundational internet infrastructure. When Kai returns, he adds a key detail from the Anthropic workshop: the presenter warned that any harness built today will need to be updated once Mythos ships, because the model will be substantially more capable and the evaluator will need to shift its focus accordingly. The message was essentially that current harness work is not wasted, but the goalposts will move and teams need to plan for that.
AI-found zero-days and hosted agent teams
The conversation turns to the security implications of models capable of finding zero-days. Both hosts agree that if models like Opus can reliably detect novel vulnerabilities, those findings have serious real-world value. “If the bug bounty is not being awarded properly, these get sold in the black market or state actors and hackers abuse these to have real significant impact.” Cloudflare comes up as a company well-positioned to benefit, given its existing DDoS and security product surface area. The second Anthropic announcement discussed is a hosted agent teams product, where Anthropic would run coordinated multi-agent systems on your behalf. The presenter mentioned that these agents coordinate through the file system. The co-host draws a parallel to Stripe’s published “minions” agent system, a markdown document that any startup can use as a blueprint to build their own orchestration, and argues that if you are already paying Anthropic for the model, using Anthropic-hosted agent teams is a logical next step rather than paying a third-party orchestration startup.
Adversarial evaluators and prompt optimization with Pydantic
Kai reflects on how he actually uses adversarial agents in his own workflow: he plans thoroughly, then instructs a separate agent to verify that what was built matches the plan. The adversarial pass reliably surfaces skipped tests and unstated shortcuts. One example he gives is an agent that refused to write a test because it would require forking a git clone, which the agent deemed unsuitable for a unit test, but never flagged this decision explicitly. A conference tip that got a laugh from the audience: write your specs and breadcrumbs in JSON rather than markdown, because agents are reportedly less likely to override JSON. Kai disagrees with this approach, preferring collaborative markdown that he and the agent co-own and diff together. The Pydantic CEO then gave a presentation on an AI observability framework that uses a scan technique to iteratively refine prompts. The system starts from a simple prompt, runs roughly 100 cycles, compares outputs against a golden test set, and converges on a version with meaningfully higher accuracy. “Instead of 90% accurate, 99% accurate – this is the way to do it, or this is one approach to consider.” Kai notes the obvious limitation: a new model can render the optimized prompt less relevant, but for high-stakes deterministic use cases the investment still makes sense.
Domain vocabulary as a quality lever, and AI-native onboarding
A Google Stitch announcement surfaces as a reference point for a broader point about terminology. A Google UX designer walked through how using precise design vocabulary, terms that models have been trained on, produces dramatically better output than vague instructions. Knowing the right words triggers the model to operate at an expert level; not knowing them means accepting mediocre output without realizing it. The co-host then describes an AI-native onboarding experiment: a new team member was set up to do everything through AI, and built a Terraform dependency visualizer. Interestingly, the model referenced a feature from a low-star open-source fork that the team does not use and had never mentioned, apparently drawing it from pre-training weights rather than any web search. The hosts find this striking evidence of how much obscure technical knowledge is embedded in model weights. The Google DeepMind workshop at the conference reinforced this theme: attendees were asked only to install a skill, and regardless of whether they were using VS Code, Claude Code, or other tools, nearly everyone produced a working proof-of-concept demo without writing any code by hand.
Software distribution through prompts and model dependency risks
Andrej Karpathy’s approach of posting a gist and telling people to hand it to their coding agent comes up as a new model of software distribution. Both hosts note this is not entirely new, Stripe’s minions markdown achieved the same thing, but it represents a real shift in how projects propagate. The conversation then turns to infrastructure risk: when Anthropic had service disruptions the previous day, both hosts felt the dependency acutely. The co-host mentions Gemma from Google as a locally runnable open-weight alternative on Hugging Face, and both discuss Apple silicon, particularly the M-series unified memory architecture, as the most practical hardware for running these models locally. The episode closes with Kai walking past Big Ben and the Houses of Parliament on his way into the conference venue, noting the AI Engineer Europe event is held adjacent to the Houses of Parliament, and signing off to volunteer for crowd control as his way of getting in.
Model: cli/claude/sonnet
Transcript (auto-generated from YouTube captions)
I've been some I'm coming for you from a bus stop. And the advertising Singapore here um Funny enough, that's not my bus. And um Yeah, this is London. This is what London looks like. Can you hear me clearly? Yes, I can hear you. They are advertising Singapore and this is London. Yeah. >> or what? I thought like you had some super deluxe bus stop area where you could sit with a laptop but you're calling from the phone. No, no. To be To be honest, the fact that I have my phone out and the cyclist bugging me by it shows you I have nerves of steel. Because it's quite common to get your phone nicked here. Yeah, well, that that was Saigon 5 years ago. I don't know. I mean, you guys >> What did they do? Stop the crime in Saigon? Cut people's hands off? Uh well, I don't know. I'm not in District 1 anymore, but like it's surprising to hear that London is like that. Belgium wasn't like that in 2006 when I left. To hear Europe being in a situation that Saigon, Vietnam, a third world country is in Yeah. >> 6 years ago. That's the thing that my wife and I joke about because like for example, to our experience with building stuff here in England is like third world. But mentality like you have to pay someone, you have to pay someone, you have to pay someone. It's just pay someone for that. You can't actually build. Yeah, so Yeah. And that's true, actually. All right, so I just wanted to say that the conference yesterday was great and I'm going to It's only 2 more days of it. It's incredible. So I'm looking forward to that. And uh 4 days? Yeah. I went to an I went to an anthropic talk and I went to They just made a whole bunch of announcements at Anthropic. >> Yeah. And It's insane. Um The It was a workshop, but it It was more like a presentation. They would like to They were basically going through that that blog that I think we we kind of might have mentioned to each other. The one about the one about the harness, the one about the the agents, adversarial agents, and the evaluators, and things like that. Oh, yeah. Yeah, I adversarial agents is the keyword now. I think I called it adversarial, but it's adversarial, of course, like I would The other word that they kept on dropping like it was hot was rubric rubric, which I think I had to look it up, which means instruction. They put it rubric for some reason. Have you ever heard this expression or term? No. What's What is it? Rubric. Rubric? Mhm. Not sure what that is. Um But I I thought I I have a I have a good idea how to you know, create my own harness. If I have I have like a good start about that. So, I I have a good idea about creating something that can spend $100 and come up with a you know, a richer game maker or some other some other thing. So, so they they equipped us how to spend a chunk of change, and then of course, I mentioned like, "Oh, what happens if it's going wrong?" It's like, "Oh, you have trust issues." It sounds like your harness or your evaluators aren't good enough or something. Okay, this is my boss. And you said, "No, it's Claude Code that gave me trust issues." Well, I'm going to mute myself. >> Yeah, that's They're in the bus now? I'm in the double decker Kikikik double decker. But busy. I don't know what the empty is down over there. God, I'm going to be that guy on the bus talking. Hate those people. Uh And the the other talk that was really interesting was by Pedantic. I don't know if you've ever used Pedantic. Pedantic is a Python unit testing library or what? Or is it Um behavior driven behavior testing I know it is like a schema manager, like a Oh. like a model manager. Why is my face like this? Like they're super It's like somebody smashed me in the face and there's Yeah, so so that's pretty cool. I mean I thought you were going to Yeah, so you did the workshop. What else did you, you know, pick up from the hallway track or what they call it? I can hear you, but it dropped. Well, then while we're waiting for Kai to get back, let's talk about amazing Project Glass Wing. I mispronounced it. Became embarrassing. Glass being a project that Anthropic announced with their latest Is it Mythos? model uh basically identifying so many vulnerabilities. Yeah, I'm back. I'm back. I was just talking about project Glass wing and Mythos and is it Mythos, right? The new uh Mhm. model that Anthropic does not want to release until the internet has had the time to prepare. Yeah, there's there's definitely some hype about it and and the uh And during the Anthropic Well, the Anthropic um Say that Like the crazy thing about the Anthropic talk was that he was like talking about the the harnesses and the evaluator and the and the prompts that you would do. But then he warned that when Mythos comes out, the your harness would have to be updated because because you know, Mythos is a lot better. So, your harness would have to like focus on other things. You know what I mean? >> Yeah. It's like it's like, hey, we're doing all this work but like once this new model comes out, we'll be able to do things better. So, you just have to like, you know, push yourself down the line a bit. Yeah, I mean, there's this interesting talk I think Is it Simon Wilson on his interview but I think somebody else as well. They talked like our role right now is to Simon Wilson Willison Wilson I don't know how to pronounce his last name. He definitely talks about keeping uh a backlog of projects that you you try and then you see the AI cannot do and you put it on the backlog. Like you say this one day we'll be able to do it and just keep going back and trying out those projects. So, do keep feeling out like the boundaries as they are moving as models are getting better, like where are we now? Where How far can we go? And to keep living on that like they call it the border. There was I saw two different talks YouTubes YouTube presentations about um what we can do because I think the the biggest problem is which I think we mentioned before is not realizing what the model can already do and still doing things that we should just hand off to the model. And I think Cuz like Anthropic announced two things, right? They announced this um three things. They announced the project last week and the impact of of that cap- capabilities detecting decade-olds um zero days inside foundational infrastructure in the internet would, you know, create huge impact on the banking systems and the trust that we can have on on on I mean, even if it's marketing from Anthropic, which I don't think it is, but you may assume it is. Um it is a fact that that these these models like Opus, they're able to detect bugs and then pra- practically zero days, right? And if the bug bounty is not being awarded properly, um these get sold on the black market or state actors and hackers abuse these to, you know, have real significant impact. >> Yeah. I was I was had a thought that like AI agents you can you can effectively organize botnets of agents nowadays cuz that's all the rage, right? I think it was quite expensive, but that's what Cloud Botnet is, right? I mean, the whole Cloud Book was basically a botnet, um you know, directed by people to simulate um all kinds of stories. And then people are like, "Oh my god, these agents are planning a revolution. They're designing their own language." Yeah, yeah, yeah, okay. Um but but that was one of the announcements, right? Basically, we're reaching a a level of of of intelligence that that it's rare amongst humans, and humans have that have that expert level capabilities are the ones that are able to basically hack into software, find zero-days, and I mean I really enjoyed reading Phineas Hacker's breakdown of how he hacks the hacking team and how he built like a zero-day on a router that he knew uh like a a different an um type of router device that they used, and he he tried it his exploit against several other routers on the internet before he actually attacked the target. So, this type of intelligence there are humans that have it, and they are able to do it clearly. And if you put that in the wrong hands It makes me think Cloud Cloudflare is going to do well because they have all these security products to stop agents to the moment. It's not a bad observation, yeah. I mean, any any organization that that is I mean, Cloudflare is known for their extremely good DDoS protection and so on. Don't get started Don't get me started on their UI skills. They're the worst. Um but they anyway, the second announcement was the a product for agent like I don't know, I haven't looked too much into it, but it sounds like hosted agent teams. So, you can run or build agent teams. Now, um or you can just have an Anthropic hosted agent teams, which is something really super interesting. I think he I think I think the guy mentioned it yesterday, and they coordinate using the file system, I think he was saying. Um There's There's a lot going on with Anthropic. May- L- I mean, there's quite a few startups that are going and saying like, "Okay, you know, Stripe published a markdown saying that this is our agent minion agent system. Uh we're not going to open source this, but if you take this markdown, you can build your own. Um and so I think there's a lot of startups that that were built around that saying like, oh, you know, Stripe can build it, but not a lot of like medium-sized companies or small startups cannot build it. So there's definitely a need for a SaaS that provides this. And I believe that like if you're going to pay Anthropic for the module, then I might as well use Anthropic for the agent team if they provide a service, right? Why would you need to pay some third-party startup um to pay to to do agent orchestration. Uh but there's discussion that I I had a lot with my friend because I'm talking about hey, this spectrum design is really good. Um but they're just going like now you just need a you just need a single skill. You just need a brainstorm skill and Opus and um you don't need to go through this whole spectrum design workflow anymore. Um you get like an interview experience where it asks you, what about this? What about that? Just a few key points that you want to clarify and then it goes off and builds it. Like you don't need all of that additional stuff anymore and it I think we're definitely going towards that. >> Have you Do you Do you know what I talk Do you know what I mean when I have to share the slides with you? But do you know what I mean by by um an evaluator and an adversarial agent because And I know you since you do spec dev or and spec dev spectrum development the the way that they explained it is that the plan is very high level and then the emphasis goes in the evaluator. So basically in the evaluator stage you put the effort I mean, this is my interpretation. But my interpretation is that like your evaluator is basically where your spec now lives and because you're you're basically at the role where the product owner is basically or the the client or something is is basically evaluating what was built. So, now you have to uh make sure the evaluator has I guess your requirements and your expectations all there so that it can evaluate the the build uh stage. Does that make sense? Yeah, makes sense. I mean I didn't I I hadn't thought that far because because I always I use adversarial agents a lot now. I really love them. Um but it does mean I I can do it very effectively because I spent so much time planning. So, because I spent so much time planning I can tell the agent now verify that whatever we build matches and every single time there's something. There's like it most most of the time it just skips the tests. It just says, "Oh, this no needed for this test. Uh that one would take too long." Like last time it told me I'm not writing I'm not writing the test because it wouldn't be suitable for a unit test because it would take too long to run because it run it forks out to get clone. I'm as like, "Yeah, but I would have liked to known that, you know, that you are not writing those tests because of that." Cuz they're all just missing. So, the adversarial re uh review always surfaces these stuff. It's always super interesting. So, but it does require like you say an evaluator to be very much aware about exactly what do you want. Otherwise what can an like like uh what can an adversarial review give you if you don't have a clear definition of what you expect versus what you got, right? Yeah, exactly. Exactly. So, oh, the the other tip that Ash dropped which I think had a chuckle in the crowd was uh he was saying that when you write your um write your what do you call it? Your specs or what you want or your tips or your breadcrumbs in JSON because for some reason he was saying that the that the the agent will or less likely override the JSON. And I thought that was a weird but That is weird cuz like I don't know with me I want to ignore the JSON. >> I want the agent and me to own the the markdown together. I like the agent is constantly rewriting it and I'm always really careful looking at how it rewrites it based on my instructions. So for me markdown is pretty good um but maybe >> Yeah yeah like nothing I could catch with a uh Yeah I think it would be much harder for me to review the diff if it was JSON. Yeah. So I don't know that's a bit weird step. Let me let me talk about the Pedantic one which I thought was really interesting. So there's a CEO of Pedantic Samuel I can't remember his surname. I love to see the guys like this. He was very kind of inspiring. He's like the alpha geek in my opinion you know. He's the CEO of a company. I think Pedantic company's it's got I don't know how if it's doing well but like it's great to see the CEO like obviously hands-on coding the the demo and giving the presentation and anyway I just love to see a CEO who knows his stuff. And then he presented a framework an AI observability framework where where essentially you uh the demo I thought was pretty cool. It basically uses a scan technique to sort of refine the prompt. So basically you can you can go it picks the best things of the prompt and and and so that it has like a an agent to sort of find a a better or try different other prompts. And then has like, you know, 100 cycles. And then it And then you have like a like a golden uh test set. You have a test set that says like what the right answers were. So then the agent's able to to change the prompt so that the prompt gives better and better and better results with high accuracy. I thought it was I was super cool, but of course I asked the question like, you know, if there's a new model isn't this all this money spent going to going to waste? And he said yes, but like in certain in certain use cases like uh you know, where things uh where things need to be a bit more uh accurate or it's deterministic is the wrong word, but like when you when you want your prompt to be accurate if you want your prompt to be, you know, instead of 90% accurate 99% accurate this is the way to do it or or this is one approach to consider. And I thought it was fascinating because I did You you do start from like a stupid prompt like, you know, find the family relations of these politicians. And then and then once you throw throw it into this GAN um uh harness you have a much more involved um prompt which has all those words like, you know, carefully select and and and has all the steps. I thought it was fascinating how things. I heard also about industry jargon. Ah, I remember when when um there was I saw some Twitter about design because a lot of people like complain about AI design looks the same. You can load these um you know, Anthropic web design things, but um ultimately the the generated designs are not very good. And so, there was this um I think it's from the Google Stitch announcements when they talk about because Stitch is really good at creating web designs now. And one of the UX designers at Google went through the the procedures that he took um to go from a mediocre web design to like a real expert level design where he says like, "As a designer, we talk about these terminology and this is a terminology you need to be a familiar with if you want to manage the design created by a model to look professional and not look like slop." And um and and I think it was also related to industry jargon like being able to be precise by using the right terminology because the models they know, right? They've been trained all of it. It's just up to us like if if we know the terms, we can then trigger the the the the level of of um of what do you say, quality that that is that we will accept if we are if we are familiar with it. But if we're not, we will just accept some low-level quality web design because we're like, "Okay, we know very basic stuff and this looks good enough, right?" But if you're an expert web designer, you know all the all the trigger terms that basically the model knows like, "All right, we're talking about some serious professional web design here. We're going to do We're going to make something that has the proper, you know, what do you call it, highlights and dark tones and whatever. This this tweet this tweet was super interesting because I really like I used to really like doing like, you know, graphics and and stuff when I was playing Counter-Strike and I made my my my team's web page and um I want a lot of websites, so I really used to love this, but I was just not to not that good at >> Yeah, it is it is fascinating to think that you can drop a word and then it will the the will behave differently. Well, absolutely. Well, it makes total sense, right? I mean, I was just having a call earlier with a um This is actually an interesting story. Um we identified that in our Terraform workspace, we have quite a few dependencies, and sometimes cycles were created where something depends on something, and then that thing ends up depending on the previous thing. So, we wanted to visualize our our Terraform, you know, uh with like remote state lookups, how how this whole thing is connected. Mhm. >> which is what I built the grid for, if you remember, like the grid >> Yeah, yeah, yeah, I was going to I was going to say that, like isn't that what Takos is all about? Uh this is what the grid uh a separate Takos is is for. It's allows you to define your dependencies. But, um we have those dependencies in our Terraform config, and we're not rolling out the grid at the moment due to the fact that I'm, you know, part-time on that project, so Um so, I decided to to just I I have somebody new that came in, and um I'm onboarding him in a very AI-native way, asking him to do everything with AI. And uh he built something. Um And it's very funny, because it the model knows an open-source tool that maybe has like, I don't know, 100 people, 100 stars, super low, and it has a website. And it has a feature that we don't use, because I forked it. And when it builds something, it says it start talking about this feature. And I went to through the whole log, like is there any web search? Like how did the model come to the conclusion that the feature is there without a web search? It can only be because it's somewhere in its corpus, and it's inside its weights. I don't know how many billion parameter model this is, that it, you know, knows that this particular open source project has that particular feature which you know, we don't use. But how did it know? You know, like you can ask it crazy things, like do people throw cats off towers in Belgium? And then they will go like, yes, there's this tradition in this city where people throw cats off off off a tower and it's because after the winter they had too many cats, so they had to throw them down the tower. It's like, how the hell does it know this? You know? I think we talked about this before. Well, this cat thing I've heard about it. Um Yes. Uh Well I So, I Um I'm approaching my destination soon. The the the last um session I went to was one by Google DeepMind. And the one thing that I found just you you were mentioning like an AI native onboarding. So, the way that they did it was like um okay, we're going to run through this this example. I for this voice API Lirium or something like this. And they they asked the the workshop attendees just to install a skill. And it worked pretty well. Like there were people using there were there were people using anti-gravity, there's people using like myself using Claude Code. There was a surprising a lot of people using code. But but at the end of the day almost everyone managed to to create um a proof of concept or whatever, like a a demo using these Google APIs just via a skill. And I thought to myself wow, it's amazing cuz no one wrote any code uh during this workshop. But everyone managed to produce um an app in a way. So, but crazy times. This is But it's just amazing that like the skills are really You don't need to type anything into an editor. Oh, I'm passing Westminster Abbey. This is where the king gets >> Now, there's also this um people are talking about how amazing it is that uh and um what's Karpathy? He he says he talks about uh something that he uses, a process. And he described it and people really liked it the idea. And then he said, "Look, if you want to build it, here's a gist. Give this to your coding agent and it will build the platform for you." And then people started raving like, "Oh my god, he just did software distribution through a gist. Ah!" Yeah, all through a all through a prompt. Okay, I need to get off this bus now. Um So, you're going to have to excuse me. I need >> one, right? I mean I got to put me on mute. >> the same thing. Although Yeah. The the conference venue is right next to the Houses of Parliament. I can show you um Big Ben in a bit. Got up at the wrong time. Big Ben from the Edge of Tomorrow. You know Edge of Tomorrow? And dropped. So, Edge of Tomorrow is a film with Tom Cruise where he is fighting an alien invasion and they are actually at the part of the war where the humans lose and they lose by taking London. So, there's a quite a few scenes of aliens invading London. And the plot of the movie is that every time one of the Well, the agents have to keep The aliens have a capability of certain aliens resetting the time if they get killed, allowing a replay. It's kind of like a game. And for some reason one the main actor gets that skill. So, every time he dies, he resets to the previous day whenever he acquired the skill of being able to reset. And why I watched it six times is because it's exactly like a computer game, you know, when you keep getting keep dying and then keep getting reset to until you execute the level perfectly because you can predict things that are going to happen. Uh wait. Are you just talking by yourself? Yeah. You're you're like I That's another thing that that's a bit of a trend. Oh, oh, there's there's a married couple here. Uh you mean >> Uh we're we're we're basically like before before a recorded AI talk, like you can go like you saw that tweet. I think you shared it to me like and yeah and with my the sales figures went 3x and then or something crazy like you make some crazy statements and then people join the call and then when it summarizes the headline is something insane like And then you talked you you talked about how the aliens landed and uh and then then he switched to uh you know, some financials. Oh, yeah, you can you see Big Ben over there? Yeah, I see it. Nice. So so Yeah, this is my start. So, I'm assuming that when you were when I when I got disconnected there, you were just just talking about some wild things. No, it was not too wild. It was related to the fact that I only saw Big Well, I don't I've not Maybe I've seen Big Ben in real life, but I was I most memorably for me is the scenes in the movie Edge of Tomorrow where Tom Cruise is um fighting >> a good invasion. Is that the one he dies all the time, right? >> Yeah, he dies and resets. So, I was just explaining that that aliens are fighting. The female lead was great, too. She's uh South African, isn't she? Or is she also No, no, that that No, she's not. So, not that one. Yeah, I really liked the the cuz I was doing yoga at the time and then there's a scene in the in the movie when she's doing yoga and I thought, "Yeah, yoga, baby." She's doing exercises in this training hall where um it's like a simulation of They're in these huge suits to fight, right? And so, have to get used to it. >> it's super cool movie. It's super cool movie. I love it. Yeah, great movie. Um okay, well >> about something else. I'm talking something about Ah, yeah, uh software distribution through a gist. But, it's it's not Karpathy who did this first, right? I mean, Minions from Stripe was also like just point them at this blog and they'll build it um type of distribution. Yeah. It's pretty cool. Yeah. But I could I could I couldn't help but think that like I think we had a blip with the internet or pulled um Anthropic was was uh having some disruptions Yeah, they do they >> in the day yesterday. Yeah, yeah. And I couldn't help but think to myself like you know we we we we we think how cool it is that you can build something with uh a prompt. But, of course, if you don't have that infrastructure in place then But, that's why >> don't have I I like just imagine the future where this mythos is amazing and it's able to do our work and I'm like happily using it like probably most people are but the minute it it's it gets taken away from me it's like it's going to be crazy. Yeah, but but at the same time I mean we talked about this before, right? That's why people that are like doom prepping for the time that those AI inference providers whatever due to war or whatever are no longer able to provide the service cuz I've been in countries where the service is not active and it's really painful. Um, that's why and now with Gemma from from Google people are I mean I'm reading very very conflicting evaluations of it. People are like, "Oh my god, Gemma is really worse than Gwen." Uh, and some people are like, "Once you fine-tune it and you you know how to set it up properly, Gemma is amazing." What about Gemma? Like is it like an open Open weights model, yeah. Like it's on on hugging face. Um, so you can run it. Uh, I'm waiting for a a big paycheck and and buying like an M5. You know, Mac Mac is people always say like Apple was dumb, they don't have Apple intelligent like their Apple intelligence projects failed, but they really built great hardware where they they make the bandwidth between the memory and the CPU so good that Yeah, yeah. We were joking there was some there was some ex-Apple people in the in our telling to over lunch. And uh, they were sort of joking that like Apple is so bad at AI, but they have the best hardware. Yeah. And uh, and right now their strategy seems to be uh, you know, pulling pulling along either Google or uh, open AI to get the best open um, to get the best model without them actually having to do anything. Cuz I guess they have the cash or something. Cuz they they haven't actually fully committed to using the Google model or or open AI model in their in their products allegedly. So people say it's because Apple has such a high reputation to uphold. But I mean that that if like because the AI can fail so spectacularly um because of it being non-deterministic and it could result in the product being in a very bad daylight like where it fails. Yeah, that's that's why they haven't integrated it but He he mentioned it uh one of the ex-Apple people said like, you know, they own the the interface or they own the platform so they are like in the best position, right? And we we just observed inside the lunch hall, you know, most people are using most people are using iPhones, right? Okay, I got to get This is This is the thumbnail here. This is the AI engineer Europe thumbnails. They had like a huge lobster out here yesterday. Yeah, you sent me a picture. We put it on I don't know why I I don't know why it isn't here today. Possibly something Possibly. I don't even like I'm like, how do they get these huge lobsters? Is someone just traveling around with a [ __ ] with a [ __ ] But But how did how did they get a lobster here? These buildings all around here are just magnificent. I love them. It looks like Ghent. I mean, if you go to city center Ghent, you have these massive um like cathedrals and and and wide market places very similar to this. So hey, do you have a Riverside account because ideally I I could end this recording and you could you could upload the or finish editing these three clips. Cuz I'm going to have an absolutely no time today. I have a Riverside account. I even have pro for 2 months for free. And uh Maybe I'll try invite you. Or something. I don't know. I don't know if it works if two people have different accounts. You mentioned that if I want to edit it, then it needs to be with a Can you just send me your email or your login? Cuz I tried it last time and it said like this. Mhm. Okay, I'm going to go in here and and volunteer. Uh I'm going to be doing crowd control this morning. This is the way I scored entrance. Anyway, it's going to be a great day. Bye. All right. Bye. I





